I know that when people were discussing the possibility of Firefly or Brimstone targeting someone for an apple, that was a reason to not vote for her. Because presumably, she wouldn't kill again. ...I can understand the logic, but something about it still doesn't sit entirely well.
[It's because he is a vengeful person who thinks those who spill the blood of innocents should face punishment for the crime of it.]
[for her, it would depend on who and why whether she wanted their blood spilled, but it would be hard to forgive.]
It's possible it's still the best thing to do, for everyone's survival, to vote for the person who has lost their mind. [...] Then again, if the situation were less ambiguous than Firefly's, there's an argument for making it quite clear to anyone else considering trying for an apple that you do so at the risk of your life. I don't want to let anyone thinking about it believe that they can safely rely on us focusing on the other culprit.
Considering we can supposedly keep whomever we don't vote for under supervision of our choice- [JAIL.] -then I would say your idea isn't a terrible one. I would hate to set a precedent.
[YOU CAN'T JUST KILL FOR APPLES AND CLAIM SELF-DEFENSE AND FLEE BECAUSE THERE ARE POSSESSED PEOPLE OUT THERE.
the way i typed this tagbomb up at like 10am and i see only gun chaos and punching now]
no subject
[even if that's not how elysia saw the world, even if she tried to understand everyone.]
no subject
I suppose we'll see tomorrow. We'll have to work hard with fewer hands and two deaths to investigate... I hate the idea of one being left unsolved.
no subject
no subject
[It's because he is a vengeful person who thinks those who spill the blood of innocents should face punishment for the crime of it.]
no subject
[for her, it would depend on who and why whether she wanted their blood spilled, but it would be hard to forgive.]
It's possible it's still the best thing to do, for everyone's survival, to vote for the person who has lost their mind. [...] Then again, if the situation were less ambiguous than Firefly's, there's an argument for making it quite clear to anyone else considering trying for an apple that you do so at the risk of your life. I don't want to let anyone thinking about it believe that they can safely rely on us focusing on the other culprit.
no subject
[YOU CAN'T JUST KILL FOR APPLES AND CLAIM SELF-DEFENSE AND FLEE BECAUSE THERE ARE POSSESSED PEOPLE OUT THERE.
the way i typed this tagbomb up at like 10am and i see only gun chaos and punching now]
no subject